Wordfish Scaling
Wordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x ↗
- Lowe, W., & Benoit, K. (2013). Validating Estimates of Latent Traits from Textual Data Using Human Judgment as a Benchmark. Political Analysis, 21(3), 298–313. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpt002 ↗
- Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps028 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Wordfish Scaling of Political Texts (Unsupervised Position Estimation). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-science/wordfish-scaling
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Ideal Point EstimationPolitical Science↔ salīdzināt
- Manifesto CodingPolitical Science↔ salīdzināt
- WordfishPsihometrija↔ salīdzināt
- WordscoresPsihometrija↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →