Partisan Business Cycle Analysis
Partisan business cycle analysis tests whether left-wing and right-wing governments produce systematically different macroeconomic outcomes. Douglas Hibbs's 1977 partisan theory argued that because left and right parties represent constituencies with different exposures to unemployment and inflation, left governments durably push for lower unemployment while tolerating higher inflation, and right governments do the reverse. Alberto Alesina's 1987 rational partisan theory added rational expectations and nominal wage contracts: when parties differ and election outcomes are uncertain, the surprise of who wins generates only a transitory burst of partisan divergence in output and employment, which fades once contracts adjust. The empirical method regresses macroeconomic series on a partisan government indicator and post-election dummies to distinguish permanent from transitory effects.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467-1487. DOI: 10.2307/1961490 ↗
- Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 651-678. DOI: 10.2307/1884222 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Partisan Theory of Macroeconomic Policy and Business Cycles. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-economy/partisan-business-cycle-analysis
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Central Bank Independence IndexPolitical Economy↔ salīdzināt
- Economic Voting AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ salīdzināt
- Political Budget Cycle AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Saistītie atsauces jēdzieni
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →