Narrative Literature Review
A narrative literature review is an interpretive synthesis of published research organized around themes, concepts, or historical progression rather than systematic search. Unlike systematic reviews, narrative reviews employ subjective study selection, do not require protocol registration, and prioritize depth of interpretation over exhaustive comprehensiveness. Narrative reviews are valuable for conceptual synthesis, exploring emerging fields with sparse literature, and providing historical context; they have been the traditional form of scholarly literature synthesis since the inception of academic journals.
Avota reģistrs
Atsauces kopētas tieši no metodes avota reģistra. Tās nenozīmē nekādu apgalvojumu līmeņa verifikāciju.
- Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. · DOI 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
- Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43. · DOI 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
- Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. · DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
Kurēti apgalvojumi
Apgalvojumi saglabāti pierādījumu reģistrā, katram ar savu novērtējumu.
Šis skatījums neizgudro apgalvojumu novērtējumu, ja reģistrā tā nav.
Saistītās metodes
Ģenerēts no metodes grafika un parādīts kā mašīnas ieteiktas attiecības — netiek izvirzīts neviens pierādījumu apgalvojums.