ScholarGate
Asistents
Latent structureAssistive technology outcomes measurement

Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale

The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) measures how an assistive device affects a user's quality of life, not whether they are satisfied with it or what it lets them physically do. Developed by Jeffrey Jutai and Hy Day, the 26-item self-report scale captures the device's perceived effect across three dimensions: competence (feelings of efficacy and usefulness), adaptability (willingness to try new things and take part), and self-esteem (emotional well-being and confidence). Each item is rated on a bipolar scale from a strong decrease to a strong increase, so the instrument registers whether a device improves, leaves unchanged, or harms the user's psychosocial functioning — a distinctively quality-of-life-oriented assistive-technology outcome.

Atvērt MethodMindDrīzumāLietojiet, salīdziniet, saņemiet norādījumus
Rīki un resursi
Lejupielādēt slaidus
Mācieties un izpētiet
VideoDrīzumā

Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu

Tikai dalībniekiem

Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.

Pieteikties

Metožu karte

Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.

Avoti

  1. Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, 14(3), 107-111. DOI: 10.3233/TAD-2002-14305

Kā citēt šo lapu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/disability-studies/psychosocial-impact-assistive-devices-scale

Kura metode?

Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.

Salīdzināt blakus

Uz to atsaucas

ScholarGatePsychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)). Izgūts 2026-06-25 no https://scholargate.app/lv/disability-studies/psychosocial-impact-assistive-devices-scale · Datu kopa: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026