Theory-Based Impact Evaluation
Theory-based impact evaluation evaluates a programme by first making explicit the theory of change — the causal chain of assumptions and mechanisms through which inputs are expected to produce outcomes and impacts — and then gathering evidence to test whether each link in that chain holds. Rather than treating the programme as a black box and estimating only the net effect, it asks not just whether a programme worked but why, for whom, and under what conditions. Articulated by Carol Weiss and brought into development practice by Howard White and 3ie, it complements, rather than competes with, counterfactual designs.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- White, H. (2009). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271–284. DOI: 10.1080/19439340903114628 ↗
- Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 1997(76), 41–55. DOI: 10.1002/ev.1086 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation (Theory of Change / Contribution Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/development-studies/theory-based-impact-evaluation
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Logical Framework ApproachDevelopment Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Most Significant Change for DevelopmentDevelopment Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Randomized Evaluation in DevelopmentDevelopment Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Results-Based ManagementDevelopment Studies↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →