ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Svērtais kvotu paraugu ņemšana×Svērta izlase×
NozareAptauju metodoloģijaAptauju metodoloģija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gadsMid-to-late 20th century1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator)
AutorsDerived from quota sampling (mid-20th century market research) combined with survey weighting theory (Kalton, 1983)Morris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework)
TipsNon-probability sampling with post-collection weight adjustmentProbability sampling design
PirmavotsKalton, G. (1983). Introduction to Survey Sampling. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803921290Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
Citi nosaukumiquota sampling with weighting, weighted quota survey, post-weighted quota sampling, quota sample weightingprobability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling
Saistītās56
KopsavilkumsWeighted quota sampling combines quota sampling — recruiting a set number of respondents matching pre-specified demographic cells — with post-collection statistical weighting that adjusts each respondent's contribution to match known population proportions. The result is a non-probability design with a bias-correction mechanism, widely used in market research, political polling, and applied social surveys when probability sampling is impractical but representativeness remains a goal.Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Weighted Quota Sampling · Weighted Sampling. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare