Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Svaru kopienu noteikšana× | Kopienu noteikšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Tīklu analīze | Tīklu analīze |
| Saime≠ | Machine learning | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2004–2008 | 2002–2019 (algorithm family) |
| Autors≠ | Newman, M. E. J.; Blondel et al. | Louvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008) |
| Tips≠ | Graph clustering / community detection | Graph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family |
| Pirmavots≠ | Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗ | Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | weighted graph clustering, community detection on weighted networks, weighted modularity optimization, WCD | graph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden) |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Weighted community detection identifies densely connected groups — communities — in networks where edges carry numeric strengths (weights). By incorporating edge weights into the modularity function, it reveals structure that binary adjacency alone would miss: two nodes connected by a strong tie are treated as more similar than two nodes linked by a weak one. The Louvain algorithm is the dominant practical implementation. | Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network? |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|