ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

VOSviewer atbalstīta kopcitēšanas analīze×Kopcitēšanas analīze×
NozareZinātnometrijaBibliometrija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1973 (co-citation); VOSviewer workflow from ~20101973
AutorsHenry Small (co-citation, 1973); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (VOSviewer, 2010)Henry Small
TipsBibliometric network analysisMethod
PirmavotsSmall, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiVOSviewer co-citation mapping, bibliometric co-citation visualization, co-citation network analysis with VOSviewer, CCA-VOSviewerco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Saistītās65
KopsavilkumsVOSviewer-assisted co-citation analysis combines Henry Small's co-citation measure — counting how often two documents are jointly cited by later work — with VOSviewer's automated network construction and visual mapping capabilities. The result is a spatial map of the intellectual base of a research field, where documents that share many citing contexts cluster together, revealing foundational schools of thought and their relationships.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: VOSviewer-assisted co-citation analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare