Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Laikmeta pakāpes centralitāte× | Laika starpības centrālās vērtības noteikšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Tīklu analīze | Tīklu analīze |
| Saime | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2011–2012 | 2012 |
| Autors≠ | Holme, P.; Saramaki, J.; Kim, H.; Anderson, R. | Kim, H. & Anderson, R.; Holme, P. & Saramäki, J. |
| Tips≠ | Centrality measure (temporal extension) | Centrality measure for temporal networks |
| Pirmavots≠ | Holme, P. & Saramaki, J. (2012). Temporal networks. Physics Reports, 519(3), 97–125. DOI ↗ | Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012). Temporal networks. Physics Reports, 519(3), 97–125. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | time-varying degree centrality, dynamic degree centrality, temporal node degree, TDC | TBC, time-varying betweenness centrality, dynamic betweenness centrality, time-respecting betweenness |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Temporal degree centrality extends the classic degree centrality to time-varying networks by counting how many distinct contacts a node accumulates over time. Rather than collapsing a dynamic network into a single static graph, it preserves the temporal order of edges, yielding a more faithful measure of a node's activity and reachability across the observation window. | Temporal Betweenness Centrality (TBC) extends classical betweenness centrality to time-stamped networks by counting how often a node lies on time-respecting shortest paths — paths that traverse edges in chronological order. It identifies nodes that act as temporal brokers, controlling information or resource flow as it evolves over time, rather than in a static snapshot. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|