ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Simulācijām balstīta cēloņseku salīdzinošā izpēte×Propensity Score Matching×
NozarePētījuma dizainsPētniecības statistika
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gadsLate 20th–early 21st century (hybrid approach formalized ~1990s–2000s)1983
AutorsSynthesized from causal-comparative tradition (Donald T. Campbell; Julian Stanley) and simulation methodologyPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipsHybrid observational-simulation designMethod
PirmavotsFraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260087352Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumisimulation-augmented causal-comparative design, ex post facto simulation design, SA-CCR, causal-comparative with simulation validationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Saistītās43
KopsavilkumsSimulation-assisted causal-comparative research is a hybrid observational design that combines the ex post facto logic of causal-comparative studies — comparing groups that differ on a naturally occurring variable — with computational simulation to strengthen causal inference, test counterfactuals, and assess the robustness of observed group differences. By augmenting real-world comparisons with simulated scenarios, researchers can explore causal mechanisms that cannot be manipulated experimentally.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Simulation-assisted causal-comparative research · Propensity Score Matching. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare