Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Mēroga izstrāde× | Konstrukta validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1991–1995 | 1955 |
| Autors≠ | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tips≠ | Multi-step methodological framework | Validity evaluation framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|