Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Robustais Arellano-Bonda GMM novērtētājs× | Fiksēto efektu paneļa modelis (FE)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Ekonometrija | Ekonometrija |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1991 | 1978 |
| Autors≠ | Arellano & Bond (1991); robust inference extensions by Windmeijer (2005) | Mundlak (1978); classical treatment in Wooldridge (2010) and Baltagi (2021) |
| Tips≠ | Dynamic panel GMM estimator with robust inference | Panel regression estimator |
| Pirmavots≠ | Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. DOI ↗ | Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0262232586 |
| Citi nosaukumi | Robust Difference GMM, AB-GMM with robust standard errors, Robust first-difference GMM, Arellano-Bond robust estimator | within estimator, FE model, within-group estimator, LSDV model |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Robust Arellano-Bond GMM estimator applies the Arellano-Bond first-difference GMM approach to dynamic panel data while computing heteroscedasticity- and autocorrelation-consistent (robust) standard errors. This combination handles the Nickell bias from lagged dependent variables and simultaneously yields reliable inference when error variances differ across units or periods. | The panel fixed effects (FE) model controls for all time-invariant, unit-specific unobserved heterogeneity by absorbing it into individual intercepts. By sweeping out unit means through the within transformation, FE yields unbiased estimates of the effect of time-varying regressors even when omitted unit-level confounders are correlated with those regressors. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|