ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Risku koriģēts I fāzes klīniskais pētījums×Deva-atbildes analīze×
NozareEpidemioloģijaEpidemioloģija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1990s–2000sConceptual roots 16th century; modern epidemiological application mid-20th century
AutorsEvolved from the Continual Reassessment Method (O'Quigley et al., 1990) extended with patient-level risk covariatesParacelsus (conceptual foundation); formalized by John Snow and later Bradford Hill
TipsInterventional clinical trial designQuantitative analytical method
PirmavotsIasonos, A., Wilton, A. S., & Gonen, M. (2008). A review of stochastic dose-finding methods. Statistics in Medicine, 27(25), 5031–5046. link ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Citi nosaukumirisk-stratified Phase I trial, risk-adaptive dose-escalation study, covariate-adjusted Phase I study, risk-based dose-finding trialexposure-response analysis, concentration-response modeling, dose-response modeling, DRA
Saistītās54
KopsavilkumsA risk-adjusted Phase I clinical trial is a first-in-human or dose-finding study that explicitly incorporates patient-level risk covariates — such as organ function, prior therapy, or genetic markers — into the dose-escalation model. Rather than treating all enrolled participants as homogeneous, the design accounts for individual differences in tolerance, allowing the recommended dose to vary by risk stratum. This approach is especially common in oncology, where patients with impaired renal function or heavily pre-treated disease may tolerate lower doses than the broader population.Dose-response analysis quantifies the relationship between the magnitude of an exposure (the dose) and the probability or rate of an outcome (the response). It is a core analytical strategy in epidemiology and toxicology, providing evidence that increasing exposure systematically increases — or decreases — the risk of disease. A demonstrated dose-response gradient is one of Bradford Hill's classic criteria supporting causal inference.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Risk-adjusted Phase I clinical trial · Dose-Response Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare