Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Reflexive Thematic Analysis× | Discourse Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Autors≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|