Salīdzināt metodes

	Kvantitatīvi prioritārs jaukto metožu dizains	Pragmatiskais jauktās metodes dizains
Nozare	Pētījuma dizains	Pētījuma dizains
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	2003–2009	Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
Autors	Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
Tips	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Pirmavots	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Citi nosaukumi	QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods	pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
Saistītās	6	6
Kopsavilkums	Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other.	Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.