Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Meta-analīze, kuras pamatā ir protokols× | Pārskatīšana, pamatojoties uz PRISMA× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Zinātnometrija | Zinātnometrija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s–2015 (Cochrane established 1993; PROSPERO launched 2011; PRISMA-P 2015) | 2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020 |
| Autors≠ | Cochrane Collaboration; formalized through PROSPERO and PRISMA-P initiatives | David Moher and PRISMA Group |
| Tips≠ | Evidence synthesis with pre-registered protocol | Structured reporting framework for systematic reviews |
| Pirmavots≠ | Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.4). Cochrane. link ↗ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | pre-registered meta-analysis, prospective meta-analysis, registered meta-analysis, protocol-driven meta-analysis | PRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A protocol-based meta-analysis is a meta-analysis conducted according to a detailed, pre-registered protocol that specifies all key methodological decisions — research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, outcome measures, and statistical methods — before data collection begins. Pre-registration, typically through PROSPERO or a comparable registry, distinguishes this approach from post-hoc or exploratory meta-analyses and substantially reduces the risk of selective reporting and outcome switching. | A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|