Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Pragmatiskais lauka eksperiments× | Pragmatiskais randomizētais kontrolētais pētījums× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Eksperimentu plānošana | Eksperimentu plānošana |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1967 (pragmatic framing); 2009 (PRECIS tool) | 1967 |
| Autors≠ | Schwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic framing); formalized for practice through PRECIS framework (Thorpe et al.) | Daniel Schwartz and Joseph Lellouch |
| Tips≠ | Experimental design | Experimental design — pragmatic trial |
| Pirmavots | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | pragmatic effectiveness trial, real-world field experiment, effectiveness field trial, practical field study | pRCT, pragmatic trial, practical clinical trial, real-world RCT |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A pragmatic field experiment tests whether an intervention works under real-world, routine conditions rather than under the tightly controlled settings of a laboratory or explanatory trial. It combines the pragmatic trial philosophy — prioritising external validity and decision-relevance — with field experimentation, so findings directly inform policy and practice. The design is positioned toward the pragmatic end of the PRECIS continuum and is widely used in public health, education, agriculture, and behavioral economics. | A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) tests whether an intervention works under ordinary, real-world conditions — broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and routine care settings. Participants are still randomly assigned to treatment or control, preserving causal inference, but the study is designed to reflect the diversity and variability of actual practice rather than the ideal conditions of an explanatory trial. The defining framework is the PRECIS-2 tool, which maps any RCT along nine pragmatic-to-explanatory dimensions. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|