ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Jaudas analīze izdzīvošanas pētījumiem×Log-rank tests salīdzināšanai izdzīvošanas līknēm×
NozareStatistikaDzīvildze
SaimeHypothesis testSurvival analysis
Izcelsmes gads19811966
AutorsMantel, N.
TipsSample size determination for survival outcomesNon-parametric hypothesis test
PirmavotsSchoenfeld, D. A. (1981). The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika, 68(1), 316–319. DOI ↗Mantel, N. (1966). Evaluation of Survival Data and Two New Rank Order Statistics Arising in Its Consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 50(3), 163–170. link ↗
Citi nosaukumilog-rank power analysis, cox regression power analysis, survival power analysis, Sağkalım Analizi Güç AnaliziMantel log-rank test, Mantel-Cox test, log-rank sağkalım testi, Log-Rank Testi
Saistītās62
KopsavilkumsPower analysis for survival studies determines how many participants — and how many observed events — are required so that a log-rank test or Cox regression has a sufficient probability of detecting a clinically meaningful difference in survival between groups. The foundational formulas were derived by Schoenfeld (1981) and Lachin (1981) and remain the standard approach in clinical trial planning.The log-rank test, developed by Nathan Mantel in 1966, is a non-parametric hypothesis test that compares the overall survival experience of two or more groups throughout the entire follow-up period. It is the standard companion to Kaplan-Meier curves and determines whether observed differences between curves are statistically meaningful.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Survival Analysis Power Analysis · Log-Rank Test. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare