Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Politikas novērtējuma placebo tests× | Permutācijas (randomizācijas) tests× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Cēloņsakarību secināšana | Statistika |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s–2000s | 2005 |
| Autors≠ | Bertrand, Duflo & Mullainathan (2004 canonical formalization); Imbens & Wooldridge (2009 textbook treatment) | Good (2005); Edgington & Onghena (2007); resampling tradition |
| Tips≠ | Falsification / specification check | Nonparametric resampling test |
| Pirmavots≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI ↗ | Good, P. (2005). Permutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387202792 |
| Citi nosaukumi | placebo test, falsification test, fake treatment test, placebo regression | randomization test, exact permutation test, re-randomization test, Permütasyon Testi |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A policy evaluation placebo test is a falsification check used in quasi-experimental research to validate a causal identification strategy. The researcher applies the same estimation method to a pseudo-treatment — a time period, group, or outcome where the real policy could not have had an effect — and checks that no spurious effect is detected. A null placebo result builds confidence that the main estimate reflects a genuine causal impact rather than bias or confounding. | The permutation test is a nonparametric resampling procedure that builds the sampling distribution of a test statistic directly from the data by repeatedly shuffling the group labels. Developed in the resampling tradition and treated systematically by Good (2005) and Edgington & Onghena (2007), it requires no parametric distributional assumption and yields an exact p-value. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|