Salīdzināt metodes

	Paraugu pirātisms akadēmiskajā pētniecībā	COPE vadlīnijas publicēšanas ētikas jautājumos
Nozare	Publicēšanas ētika	Publicēšanas ētika
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	1989	1997
Autors	U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and institutional policies	Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Tips	Standard	Standard
Pirmavots	U.S. Office of Research Integrity (2023). Definition of Research Misconduct. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct (42 CFR Part 93). ORI.	Committee on Publication Ethics (2023). COPE Guidelines. COPE Website.
Citi nosaukumi	Text Plagiarism, Idea Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism	COPE, Publication Ethics Flowcharts, Editorial Guidelines
Saistītās	4	4
Kopsavilkums	Plagiarism—the use of others' words, ideas, or methods without attribution—is formally classified as research misconduct by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity and most institutions worldwide. It ranges from verbatim copying of text to paraphrasing without citation to presenting others' ideas as one's own. Unlike accidental omission of a citation (which is corrected via erratum), plagiarism implies intent or gross negligence and triggers investigation, potential retraction, and career consequences. Plagiarism detection tools (e.g., Turnitin, iThenticate) and manual checking by journals now routinely screen manuscripts.	The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), founded in 1997, is an international organization of journal editors and publishers that promotes and advances research integrity and publication ethics. COPE provides practical guidance through flowcharts, position statements, and ethical guidelines addressing misconduct (fabrication, falsification, plagiarism), authorship disputes, conflicts of interest, and corrections. COPE's resources are freely available and adopted by thousands of journals globally. COPE is not a regulator; it advises editors and researchers on handling ethical issues and promotes a culture of integrity in publishing.