ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Probabilistiskā lingvistiskā EDAS paplašinājuma metode×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads20161995
AutorsPang, Q. Wang, H. Xu, Z.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipsProbabilistic Linguistic outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set (PLTS: {L_k|p_k})Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
PirmavotsPang, Q., Wang, H., Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsPL-EDAS (Probabilistic Linguistic extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pang, Q. Wang, H. Xu, Z. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: PL-EDAS · CRITIC. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare