Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Dalības refleksīvā tēmu analīze× | Reflexive Thematic Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2006 (reflexive TA); participatory integration developed through 2010s–2020s | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 |
| Autors≠ | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); participatory application developed within participatory action research traditions | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Qualitative research method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953345 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | Participatory RTA, collaborative reflexive thematic analysis, participant-involved thematic analysis, co-analytic reflexive thematic analysis | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Participatory Reflexive Thematic Analysis (Participatory RTA) integrates Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework with participatory research principles, actively involving participants as co-analysts in generating, reviewing, or refining themes from qualitative data. The approach is simultaneously a method of analysis and a form of member engagement, ensuring that the themes produced are grounded in participants' own meaning-making rather than imposed solely by the researcher. | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|