Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kopienas kritisko diskursu analīze× | Tematiskā analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s–2000s (emerged as integrated approach) | 2006 |
| Autors≠ | Draws on Ruth Wodak, Norman Fairclough (CDA) and Kurt Lewin, Orlando Fals Borda (participatory action research) | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761961543 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | PCDA, participatory CDA, collaborative critical discourse analysis, action-oriented CDA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Participatory Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) integrates the ideology-exposing tools of Critical Discourse Analysis with the community-centred ethics of participatory action research. Researchers and community members jointly collect and analyse texts and talk to reveal how language constructs, legitimises, or contests unequal power relations — and then use those insights to drive concrete social change. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|