Salīdzināt metodes

	Daudzlīmeņu satura validitāte	Diskriminantā validitāte
Nozare	Psihometrija	Psihometrija
Saime	Latent structure	Latent structure
Izcelsmes gads	1975–2000s	1959
Autors	Rooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onward	Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
Tips	Validity evaluation / expert judgment	Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Pirmavots	Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385.	Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
Citi nosaukumi	hierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCV	discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Saistītās	6	5
Kopsavilkums	Multilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate.	Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.