Salīdzināt metodes

	Kartēšanas pārskats	Pārskata apskats
Nozare	Zinātnometrija	Zinātnometrija
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	Late 1990s–2000s; major methodological formalization ~2010s	2005
Autors	Buckland & Gann (1998); formalized by systematic review community (Campbell Collaboration, Collaboration for Environmental Evidence)	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Tips	Systematic evidence mapping methodology	Evidence synthesis review design
Pirmavots	James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 7.	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Citi nosaukumi	evidence map, systematic map, research map, literature map	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Saistītās	6	6
Kopsavilkums	A mapping review (also called a systematic map or evidence map) is a form of systematic review that aims to chart the extent, range, and nature of evidence on a broad topic rather than synthesize findings into a single pooled answer. It categorizes studies by key dimensions — such as intervention type, population, outcome, and study design — and presents the resulting landscape visually and tabularly so that researchers and practitioners can identify clusters of evidence, knowledge gaps, and priorities for future primary research or deeper synthesis.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.