Salīdzināt metodes

	Konverģentā validitāte garīgajos pētījumos	Konstrukta validitāte
Nozare	Psihometrija	Psihometrija
Saime	Latent structure	Latent structure
Izcelsmes gads	1997–2003	1955
Autors	Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & Reise	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Tips	Validity evidence framework	Validity evaluation framework
Pirmavots	Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Citi nosaukumi	longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validity	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Saistītās	6	6
Kopsavilkums	Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.