ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Longitudinālā autoetnogrāfija×Reflexive Thematic Analysis×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2000s–2010s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
AutorsCarolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner (autoethnography foundations); longitudinal extension by various scholars from 2000s onwardVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TipsQualitative longitudinal research designQualitative research method
PirmavotsEllis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759103535Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumilongitudinal self-ethnography, temporal autoethnography, long-term autoethnography, longitudinal personal narrative researchRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Saistītās66
KopsavilkumsLongitudinal autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher systematically documents, reflects on, and analyzes their own lived experience across an extended period — typically months to years. By combining the self-reflexive focus of autoethnography with a longitudinal temporal structure, this approach reveals how personal meanings, identities, and social understandings evolve over time. It bridges the personal and the cultural, producing richly layered narratives that connect individual transformation to broader social processes.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Longitudinal Autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare