Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Lokālais vidējais ārstēšanas efekts (LATE / CACE)× | Heterogēni ārstēšanas efekti (CATE / Metamācītāji)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Cēloņsakarību secināšana | Cēloņsakarību secināšana |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1994 | 2018 |
| Autors≠ | Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996) | Wager & Athey (causal forest); Künzel et al. (meta-learners) |
| Tips≠ | Instrumental-variable causal estimand | Causal machine-learning framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗ | Wager, S. & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | LATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE) | conditional average treatment effect, CATE, meta-learners, causal forest |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis. | Heterogeneous Treatment Effects is a machine-learning framework that estimates how a treatment effect varies across individuals — the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). It bundles meta-learner strategies such as the T-Learner, S-Learner, X-Learner and R-Learner alongside the causal forest of Wager and Athey (2018) and Künzel et al. (2019). |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|