Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Public Sector Leadership Assessment× | Balansētās rezultātu kartes veiktspējas mērīšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Public Administration | Stratēģiskā vadība |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2003 | 1992 |
| Autors≠ | Montgomery Van Wart | Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton |
| Tips≠ | Survey-based leadership competency assessment scale | Organizational performance measurement and management system |
| Pirmavots≠ | Van Wart, M. (2003). Public-Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 214–228. DOI ↗ | Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | Government Leadership Assessment, Public Leadership Competency Assessment, Public-Sector Leadership Evaluation, Administrative Leadership Assessment | BSC, Balanced Scorecard Framework, Kaplan-Norton Scorecard |
| Saistītās≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Public sector leadership assessment is a structured method for measuring the traits, behaviors, competencies and effectiveness of leaders in government and public organizations against an explicit leadership model. It draws on Montgomery Van Wart's influential 2003 synthesis of public-sector leadership theory, which integrated trait, behavioral, transformational and transactional traditions into a model tailored to the constraints of public service, alongside Bernard Bass's foundational work on transformational leadership. The assessment typically uses multi-rater (360-degree) surveys in which leaders, their supervisors, peers and subordinates rate observable behaviors, and the results feed both individual development and organizational leadership-capacity planning. | The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a strategic management system that translates organizational strategy into a coherent set of performance measures across four perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Learning and Growth. Developed by Kaplan and Norton (1992) in Harvard Business Review, the BSC addresses a fundamental management gap: most organizations measure what is easy to measure (financial results) while neglecting what drives results (customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, employee capability). By balancing financial outcomes with non-financial drivers, the BSC enables organizations to understand and manage strategy execution, identify causal relationships between performance drivers, and align organizational actions with strategic objectives. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|