ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Intersectionality Analysis×Teorija saknēs×
NozareGender StudiesKvalitatīvie pētījumi
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19891967
AutorsKimberlé CrenshawBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
TipsCritical qualitative analytic frameworkMethod
PirmavotsCrenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative AnalysisGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Saistītās43
KopsavilkumsIntersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Intersectionality Analysis · Grounded Theory. Izgūts 2026-06-24 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare