Salīdzināt metodes

	Implicit Political Attitude Measure	Implicītās asociācijas tests
Nozare	Politiskā psiholoģija	Psiholoģija
Saime	Process / pipeline	Hypothesis test
Izcelsmes gads	1998	1998
Autors	Anthony Greenwald; B. Keith Payne	Anthony Greenwald, Debbie McGhee, and Jordan Schwartz
Tips	Reaction-time implicit measure	Computerized reaction-time measure
Pirmavots	Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.	Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.
Citi nosaukumi	Political IAT, Implicit Association Test (Political), Affect Misattribution Procedure, AMP	IAT, Implicit Attitude Test
Saistītās	4	2
Kopsavilkums	Implicit political attitude measures assess automatic, relatively uncontrolled evaluations of political objects, candidates, parties, racial and social groups, using reaction-time and misattribution tasks rather than self-report. The two leading instruments are the Implicit Association Test (Greenwald et al., 1998), which infers attitudes from the speed of categorization, and the Affect Misattribution Procedure (Payne et al., 2005), which infers them from how a prime biases judgments of ambiguous targets.	The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a computerized measure designed to detect automatic associations between concepts in memory, such as implicit attitudes toward social groups or implicit self-concepts. Introduced by Greenwald, McGhee, and Schwartz in 1998, it infers the strength and valence of associations from the ease and speed with which people categorize stimuli when pairing concepts, revealing unconscious biases and attitudes that may not appear in explicit self-report measures.