ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Lauku kartēšanas pārskatīšana×Bibliometriskā analīze×
NozareZinātnometrijaZinātnometrija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2005 (foundational framework); field-mapping purpose formalised c. 2015–20181969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
AutorsArksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework); field-mapping purpose formalised by Munn et al. and Peters et al.Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
TipsEvidence synthesis — systematic review variantQuantitative literature analysis
PirmavotsMunn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic review and scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
Citi nosaukumifield-mapping scoping study, evidence-mapping scoping review, field map review, scoping review for field mappingbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Saistītās66
KopsavilkumsA field-mapping scoping review is a purposive variant of the scoping review in which the overarching goal is to chart the conceptual and empirical landscape of a research field — identifying what has been studied, by whom, using which methods, and where knowledge gaps remain. It follows the Arksey and O'Malley scoping framework but is explicitly oriented toward producing a structured map of a field rather than answering a focused clinical or policy question.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Field-mapping Scoping review · Bibliometric Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare