Salīdzināt metodes

	Feeling Thermometer Analysis	Affective Polarization Measurement
Nozare	Politiskā psiholoģija	Politiskā psiholoģija
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	1964	2012
Autors	American National Election Studies / Aage Clausen	Shanto Iyengar, Gaurav Sood & Yphtach Lelkes
Tips	Affect rating instrument	Composite survey index
Pirmavots	Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257.	Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431.
Citi nosaukumi	Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating Scale	Affective Polarization Index, Partisan Affect Gap, Thermometer Difference Measure
Saistītās	4	4
Kopsavilkums	The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research.	Affective polarization measurement quantifies the gap between how positively people feel toward their own political party (the in-party) and how negatively they feel toward the opposing party (the out-party). Iyengar, Sood and Lelkes (2012) showed that this affective divide has grown sharply even where issue positions have not, reframing polarization as a social-identity phenomenon of partisan like and dislike rather than ideological distance.