Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Skala apmierinātības ar e-mācībām× | Tiešsaistes uzticamības skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Informācijas sistēmas | Informācijas sistēmas |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2008 | 2000 |
| Autors≠ | Bolliger, Halupa, Chi & Kilduff | Walker & Johnson; Jarvenpaa et al. |
| Tips≠ | Likert-scale satisfaction measure | Likert-scale trust measure |
| Pirmavots≠ | Chi, T., & Kilduff, P. P. (2011). Understanding consumer perceived value of casual online games. New Media & Society, 13(6), 954-971. link ↗ | Walker, D., & Johnson, R. (2006). Why consumers use online and visit physical stores. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(2), 143-151. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | ELSS, Online Learning Satisfaction | Consumer Trust, Web Trust |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The E-Learning Satisfaction Scale measures learner satisfaction with online educational experiences across multiple dimensions including platform quality, instructor effectiveness, course content, peer interaction, and technical support. Developed through research by Bolliger, Halupa, Chi, and others studying online higher education, the scale helps institutions assess course quality, predict learner retention, and identify improvement opportunities in digital education delivery. | The Online Trust Scale measures consumer confidence and belief in online platforms (e-commerce websites, digital services, social platforms). Developed by researchers including Jarvenpaa, Tractinsky, and Vitale (2000) and Walker and Johnson (2006), this scale captures dimensions of perceived security, vendor reliability, privacy protection, and transaction confidence. Online trust is a critical antecedent to behavioral intention and actual purchase/usage in digital commerce contexts. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|