Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Divkārši robusta novērtēšana (AIPW)× | Kausālā mediācijas analīze (dabiski tiešie un netiešie efekti)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Cēloņsakarību secināšana | Cēloņsakarību secināšana |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2005 | 2010 |
| Autors≠ | Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins | Pearl (2001); general framework by Imai, Keele & Tingley (2010) |
| Tips≠ | Semiparametric causal estimator | Counterfactual causal decomposition |
| Pirmavots≠ | Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗ | Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and Indirect Effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), 411-420. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW) | natural direct effect, natural indirect effect, NDE / NIE decomposition, counterfactual mediation |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified. | Causal mediation analysis is a counterfactual framework that splits a treatment's total effect into a Natural Direct Effect (NDE) and a Natural Indirect Effect (NIE) that runs through a mediator. The modern general approach was formalised by Pearl (2001) and Imai, Keele and Tingley (2010), giving the decomposition a precise causal interpretation. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|