Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Diskriminantā validitāte× | Konstrukta validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1959 | 1955 |
| Autors≠ | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tips≠ | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation | Validity evaluation framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|