ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Vērstā modularitātes analīze×Starppriekšrocība (Betweenness Centrality)×
NozareTīklu analīzeTīklu analīze
SaimeMachine learningMachine learning
Izcelsmes gads20081977
AutorsLeicht, E. A. & Newman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TipsCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
PirmavotsLeicht, E. A., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008). Community structure in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 100(11), 118703. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumidirected community detection via modularity, directed Q-modularity, digraph modularity optimization, Leicht-Newman modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Saistītās56
KopsavilkumsDirected modularity analysis extends the classic Newman-Girvan modularity framework to directed graphs, where edges carry a source and a destination. Formalized by Leicht and Newman in 2008, it partitions nodes into communities by maximizing a modularity score that accounts for each node's separate in-degree and out-degree in the null model, making it the standard approach for community detection in citation networks, information flows, and other asymmetric relational data.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Directed Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Izgūts 2026-06-15 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare