Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Konverģentā validitāte× | Konstrukta validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1959 | 1955 |
| Autors≠ | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tips≠ | Validity evidence / construct validation | Validity evaluation framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|