ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Konovera-Imana pēcpārbaudes tests×Frīdmana tests×Nemenyi pārbaude pēc Frīdmens testēšanas×
NozareStatistikaStatistikaStatistika
SaimeRegression modelHypothesis testHypothesis test
Izcelsmes gads197919371963
AutorsConover & ImanMilton FriedmanPeter Nemenyi
TipsNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric repeated-measures comparison (by ranks)Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison
PirmavotsConover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675–701. DOI ↗Nemenyi, P. (1963). Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons. PhD thesis, Princeton University. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiConover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiFriedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks, Friedman rank test, Friedman TestiNemenyi Testi — Friedman Post-Hoc, Nemenyi multiple comparison test, Nemenyi procedure
Saistītās325
KopsavilkumsThe Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.The Friedman test is a nonparametric hypothesis test that compares three or more related conditions measured on the same blocks or subjects, serving as the rank-based alternative to repeated-measures ANOVA. It was introduced by Milton Friedman in 1937 and works on ordinal or continuous data without assuming normality.The Nemenyi test is a nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison procedure introduced by Peter Nemenyi in his 1963 Princeton doctoral thesis. It is applied after a significant Friedman test to identify which specific pairs of conditions differ from each other in a repeated-measures or blocked design.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Conover-Iman Test · Friedman test · Nemenyi Test. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare