Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Apstiprinošā faktoru analīze (AFA)× | Konverģentā validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1969 | 1959 |
| Autors≠ | Karl Gustav Jöreskog | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| Tips≠ | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| Pirmavots≠ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|