Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Datorizētās adaptīvās testēšanas uzticamības analīze× | Test-retest uzticamība× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1970s–1980s | 1904 |
| Autors≠ | David J. Weiss and IRT psychometricians | Karl Pearson |
| Tips≠ | Reliability estimation under adaptive testing | Reliability estimate |
| Pirmavots≠ | Weiss, D. J. (1984). Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 361–375. DOI ↗ | Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070478497 |
| Citi nosaukumi | CAT reliability, adaptive test reliability, IRT-based reliability estimation, marginal reliability in CAT | stability reliability, temporal stability, repeatability coefficient, TRT reliability |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | CAT reliability analysis quantifies measurement precision in computerized adaptive tests where each examinee receives a unique, individually tailored subset of items. Rather than a single classical coefficient, it uses item response theory to express precision as conditional standard error of measurement at each ability level, and marginal reliability as a global summary across the ability distribution. | Test-retest reliability quantifies the temporal consistency of a measure by correlating scores obtained from the same participants on two separate occasions. It is a cornerstone of psychometric validation, directly indicating whether a scale or instrument yields stable scores when the underlying construct has not changed. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|