ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Salīdzināmā autoetnogrāfija×Reflexive Thematic Analysis×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~20132006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
AutorsHayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & HernandezVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TipsQualitative research designQualitative research method
PirmavotsChang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumicollaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAERTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Saistītās66
KopsavilkumsComparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Comparative autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare