Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kognitīvās diagnostikas modeļi (DINA / G-DINA)× | Zināšanu izsekošana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Psihometrija | Izglītības analītika |
| Saime≠ | Latent structure | Machine learning |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2011 | 1994 |
| Autors≠ | Jimmy de la Torre | Albert Corbett & John Anderson |
| Tips≠ | Latent variable diagnostic classification model | Probabilistic student modeling |
| Pirmavots≠ | de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179–199. DOI ↗ | Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | Diagnostic Classification Model, Skills Assessment Model, Attribute Mastery Model, Bilişsel Tanı Modeli | BKT, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, Deep Knowledge Tracing, Bilgi İzleme |
| Saistītās≠ | 2 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Cognitive Diagnosis Models (CDMs) are a family of latent variable models designed to classify examinees according to their mastery of a set of discrete cognitive attributes or skills. The Generalized DINA (G-DINA) framework, introduced by Jimmy de la Torre in 2011, provides a unifying structure that encompasses many specific CDMs — including the DINA, DINO, ACDM, and LLM models — as special cases, enabling fine-grained diagnostic feedback beyond a single total score. | Knowledge Tracing (KT) is a student-modeling technique that estimates, at each moment in time, the probability that a learner has mastered a target knowledge component. Introduced by Corbett and Anderson in 1994, the classical Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) model treats skill acquisition as a two-state Hidden Markov Model driven by four interpretable parameters: prior knowledge, learning rate, slip, and guess. Deep variants (DKT, DKVMN, AKT) later replaced HMMs with recurrent and transformer architectures. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|