Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Beiešiskā konverģentā validitāte× | Konstrukta validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1955 |
| Autors≠ | Building on Campbell & Fiske (1959) convergent validity; Bayesian extension developed in modern psychometrics literature | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tips≠ | Validity assessment / Bayesian inference | Validity evaluation framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Levy, R. & Mislevy, R. J. (2016). Bayesian Psychometric Modeling. CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1466500952 | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | Bayesian convergent validity analysis, Bayesian MTMM convergent validity, Bayesian multitrait convergent validity, BCV | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Bayesian convergent validity applies Bayesian statistical inference to assess whether different measures of the same construct converge as theory predicts. Rather than a single-point correlation estimate, it yields a full posterior distribution over the convergent correlation, enabling probability statements about the magnitude of shared variance between theoretically related measures. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|