ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Beijesiešu ADF vienības saknes tests×Filipsa-Perona saknes tests×
NozareEkonometrijaEkonometrija
SaimeRegression modelRegression model
Izcelsmes gads1991–19921988
AutorsSims & Uhlig (1991); Koop, Osiewalski & Steel (1992)Peter C. B. Phillips and Pierre Perron
TipsBayesian hypothesis testHypothesis test (unit root)
PirmavotsSims, C. A., & Uhlig, H. (1991). Understanding unit rooters: A helicopter tour. Econometrica, 59(6), 1591–1599. DOI ↗Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiBayesian ADF test, Bayesian unit root test, Bayesian Dickey-Fuller, BADFPP test, PP unit root test, Phillips-Perron test, nonparametric unit root test
Saistītās65
KopsavilkumsThe Bayesian Augmented Dickey-Fuller (BADF) unit root test re-frames the classical ADF test within a Bayesian framework. Rather than computing a frequentist p-value, it quantifies evidence for or against a unit root by comparing posterior probabilities or Bayes factors under the null (unit root) and alternative (stationarity) hypotheses, incorporating prior beliefs about the autoregressive parameter.The Phillips-Perron (PP) test is a nonparametric unit root test for time series that corrects for serial correlation and heteroscedasticity in the error term without adding lagged differences. Introduced by Phillips and Perron (1988), it applies a kernel-based long-run variance estimator to adjust the Dickey-Fuller statistic, making it robust to a wide class of weakly dependent error processes.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Bayesian ADF unit root test · Phillips-Perron unit root test. Izgūts 2026-06-17 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare