Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts
Authorship attribution of canonical texts uses computational stylometry to test who wrote disputed sacred and classical writings, most famously the letters attributed to Paul. Several New Testament epistles bear Paul's name but have long been suspected, on historical and stylistic grounds, of coming from later hands; stylometry brings quantitative evidence to the question. The approach profiles each author's style from large numbers of features, especially function-word frequencies, and either classifies a disputed text to the closest candidate or verifies whether it could plausibly belong to a claimed author against a field of impostors. Jacques Savoy's 2019 study revisited the entire Pauline corpus with modern methods, including Burrows's Delta, and found that it clusters into groups consistent with the traditional distinction between undisputed and disputed letters.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Savoy, J. (2019). Authorship of Pauline epistles revisited. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1089-1097. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24176 ↗
- Burrows, J. (2002). 'Delta': a Measure of Stylistic Difference and a Guide to Likely Authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267-287. DOI: 10.1093/llc/17.3.267 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts (Computational Verification of Disputed Sacred Writings). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/religious-studies/authorship-attribution-canonical-texts
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ 비교
- Scripture StylometryReligious Studies↔ 비교
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ 비교
- Variant Collation and CBGMReligious Studies↔ 비교