Inter-Indexer Consistency
Inter-indexer consistency measures how far two or more people agree when they independently assign subject terms to the same documents. Because subject indexing is a judgment task — choosing which descriptors best represent a document's content — different indexers routinely pick overlapping but not identical term sets, and the degree of that overlap is a fundamental indicator of the reliability of an indexing system. The standard quantity is the Hooper-style consistency coefficient, the size of the shared term set divided by the size of the combined term set, averaged across documents; Zunde and Dexter and later Rolling refined it and connected it to indexing quality. Low consistency signals that retrieval will be unpredictable, since whether a document is found can depend on which indexer happened to process it.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Rolling, L. (1981). Indexing consistency, quality and efficiency. Information Processing & Management, 17(2), 69-76. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(81)90028-5 ↗
- Zunde, P., & Dexter, M. E. (1969). Indexing consistency and quality. American Documentation, 20(3), 259-267. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630200313 ↗
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Inter-Indexer Consistency (Agreement Between Indexers on Assigned Terms). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/library-information-science/inter-indexer-consistency
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Cranfield Evaluation ParadigmLibrary Information Science↔ 비교
- Indexing Consistency AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ 비교
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ 비교