ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

제로 포싱 및 최소 평균 제곱 오차 등화×반복 복호화를 이용한 터보 코딩×
분야통신공학통신공학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19741993
창시자Saleh Mansour and Paul ZervosClaude Berrou, Alain Glavieux, and Punya Thitimajshima
유형linear equalization algorithmiterative error-correcting code
원전Proakis, J. G. (2001). Digital Communications (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗Berrou, C., Glavieux, A., & Thitimajshima, P. (1993). Near Shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: Turbo-codes. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 1064-1070. DOI ↗
별칭channel equalization, interference cancellationiterative decoding, concatenated codes
관련55
요약Zero-Forcing (ZF) and Minimum Mean-Square Error (MMSE) equalization are fundamental linear receiver algorithms for combating intersymbol interference in dispersive channels. Developed in the context of data transmission theory, these methods form the basis of modern channel equalization in wireless and wired systems. While ZF aggressively cancels interference, MMSE balances interference suppression with noise enhancement, making it the optimal linear solution under Gaussian noise.Turbo codes, introduced by Berrou, Glavieux, and Thitimajshima in 1993, are a landmark in channel coding history. They achieve performance within 0.5 dB of the Shannon limit—the theoretical boundary for reliable communication—a feat previously thought impossible with practical complexity. Turbo codes use concatenated convolutional codes with an interleaver and iterative decoding via belief propagation. They were adopted in 3G (UMTS) and remain important in 4G/5G systems alongside LDPC codes.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: ZF/MMSE Equalization · Turbo Code. 2026-06-15에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare