방법 비교

	Within-Subjects Factorial Design	Day Reconstruction Method	Ego Depletion Paradigm
분야	사회심리학	사회심리학	사회심리학
계열	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
기원 연도	2004	2004	1998
창시자	Experimental-design tradition (widely used in social psychology)	Daniel Kahneman and colleagues	Roy Baumeister and colleagues
유형	Experimental design framework	Retrospective experience-assessment method	Sequential-task experimental paradigm
원전	Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, 306(5702), 1776-1780.	Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, 306(5702), 1776-1780.	Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
별칭	Repeated-Measures Factorial Design, Within-Participants Factorial, Crossed Within-Subjects Design	DRM, Diary Reconstruction Method, Episodic Day Reconstruction	Self-Control Depletion Paradigm, Dual-Task Self-Control Paradigm, Strength Model Paradigm
관련	2	2	3
요약	The within-subjects factorial design is an experimental framework in which each participant is exposed to every combination of two or more manipulated factors, allowing researchers to test the main effect of each factor and their interactions while using each person as their own control. Because the same individuals experience all conditions, between-subject differences are removed from the error term, giving within-subjects factorial designs substantially greater statistical power and efficiency than between-subjects designs for the same number of participants. This makes them a workhorse of experimental social psychology, especially for reaction-time, judgment, and affect studies where many trials per person are feasible. The design's power comes with the need to control order and carryover effects through counterbalancing, and to analyze the data with repeated-measures or mixed-effects models that respect the non-independence of observations from the same person.	The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM), introduced by Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, and Stone in 2004, is a technique for measuring how people experience the activities of their daily lives without the burden of real-time sampling. Respondents systematically reconstruct the previous day, dividing it into a sequence of episodes -- like scenes in a film -- and report for each episode what they were doing, where, with whom, and how they felt. By anchoring recall in concrete, ordered episodes, the method reduces the memory biases that plague global retrospective reports while approximating the affective information obtained from experience sampling. The DRM yields duration-weighted measures of experienced well-being, such as net affect and the U-index (the proportion of time spent in an unpleasant state), and reveals how feelings vary across activities and contexts. It became a key tool for studying experienced (as opposed to evaluated) well-being and the affective texture of everyday life.	The ego depletion paradigm, introduced by Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, and Tice in 1998, tests the strength model of self-control, which holds that acts of self-regulation draw on a limited, shared resource that becomes temporarily depleted with use. In the classic dual-task design, participants first perform a task requiring self-control -- such as resisting tempting food, suppressing emotion, or overriding a habitual response -- or an equivalent task without such demands, and then perform a second, unrelated self-control task. The prediction is that those who exerted self-control on the first task perform worse on the second, exhibiting ego depletion. The 1998 demonstrations were highly influential and generated a vast literature, but large-scale replication efforts in the 2010s yielded weak or inconsistent results, making ego depletion a central case in debates about replicability and prompting theoretical revisions and stricter methodological standards.