ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Veto Player Analysis×Ideal Point Estimation×
분야Political SciencePolitical Science
계열MCDMLatent structure
기원 연도19952004
창시자George TsebelisClinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)
유형Comparative institutional analysis frameworkLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice data
원전Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691091891Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗
별칭Veto Players Theory, Veto Points Analysis, Tsebelis Veto Player Framework, Policy Stability AnalysisIdeal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
관련44
요약Veto player analysis is a spatial-institutional framework, developed by George Tsebelis in his 1995 article and 2002 book, for predicting the capacity of a political system to change policy. A veto player is any individual or collective actor whose agreement is required to alter the status quo. The theory shows that the potential for policy change shrinks as the number of veto players grows, as the ideological distance between them widens, and as their internal cohesion increases — three structural variables that together determine a system's policy stability independently of constitutional labels such as presidentialism or parliamentarism.Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Veto Player Analysis · Ideal Point Estimation. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare